|
|
本帖最后由 落霞孤鹜 于 2012-12-5 19:29 编辑
好像是kvmnode02节点的,512M内存,25G硬盘,2vCPU。
在手里静置了几天,昨天下午又跑了一次 UnixBench,这个应该是以后的一个比较理想的结果了。废话不说,上跑分。- BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
- System: 99675600.kvmla.com: GNU/Linux
- OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 09:49:36 UTC 2012
- Machine: i686 (unknown)
- Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
- CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
- Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
- CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4800.2 bogomips)
- Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
- 03:08:21 up 17:20, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Benchmark Run: Tue Dec 04 2012 03:08:21 - 03:36:17
- 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13485271.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Double-Precision Whetstone 2408.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Execl Throughput 2944.7 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 574746.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 143064.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1310171.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Pipe Throughput 981032.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Pipe-based Context Switching 202821.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Process Creation 5920.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4868.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 841.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- System Call Overhead 948359.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13485271.4 1155.6
- Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2408.5 437.9
- Execl Throughput 43.0 2944.7 684.8
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 574746.4 1451.4
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 143064.5 864.4
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1310171.2 2258.9
- Pipe Throughput 12440.0 981032.3 788.6
- Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 202821.5 507.1
- Process Creation 126.0 5920.8 469.9
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4868.6 1148.3
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 841.5 1402.5
- System Call Overhead 15000.0 948359.1 632.2
- ========
- System Benchmarks Index Score 869.9
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Benchmark Run: Tue Dec 04 2012 03:36:17 - 04:04:22
- 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23747122.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Double-Precision Whetstone 4773.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
- Execl Throughput 7199.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 596110.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 195232.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1739764.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Pipe Throughput 1832060.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Pipe-based Context Switching 439497.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- Process Creation 18917.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9140.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1252.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
- System Call Overhead 1746877.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
- System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
- Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23747122.2 2034.9
- Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4773.9 868.0
- Execl Throughput 43.0 7199.2 1674.2
- File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 596110.2 1505.3
- File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 195232.0 1179.6
- File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1739764.7 2999.6
- Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1832060.0 1472.7
- Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 439497.9 1098.7
- Process Creation 126.0 18917.4 1501.4
- Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9140.9 2155.9
- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1252.7 2087.8
- System Call Overhead 15000.0 1746877.6 1164.6
- ========
- System Benchmarks Index Score 1555.5
复制代码 再更新个图片:
kvm.jpg
(191.11 KB, 下载次数: 5)
|
|