全球主机交流论坛

标题: 老鹰主机2折优惠，仅有效24小时 [打印本页]

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 15:34
标题: 老鹰主机2折优惠，仅有效24小时
本帖最后由 HelloStranger 于 2011-12-26 16:56 编辑

北京时间：12月26日14:00 ~ 12月27日13:59

可通过签名推荐链接购买，对你没损失，当然也可直接去官网买

自己今天买的圣何塞，晚些再补西雅图：

Pinging 50.23.65.* with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 50.23.65.*:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 242ms, Maximum = 273ms, Average = 265ms
Control-C
^C

作者: 哈P哥 时间: 2011-12-26 15:35

怎么没VPS呢？

作者: Kvm 时间: 2011-12-26 15:35

作者: 金关村村长 时间: 2011-12-26 15:36
无爱,要个主机也不知道干啥子好

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 15:38
优惠码：boxing2011super
优惠内容：super主机2折促销，原价$129.48一年的super主机，首年只需25.90

优惠码：55boxing2011
优惠内容：所有虚拟主机首次支付4.5折

优惠码：boxing2011r35percent
优惠内容：reseller主机达拉斯、西雅图机房，终身6.5折

优惠码：boxing2011r55percent
优惠内容：reseller主机达拉斯、西雅图机房，首次付款4.5折

作者: YesRen 时间: 2011-12-26 15:39
速度不行

作者: crazyfeng 时间: 2011-12-26 15:41
虚机没兴趣。。。

作者: immm 时间: 2011-12-26 15:42
无爱

作者: 飞天金猪 时间: 2011-12-26 15:43
小夜不是推荐老鹰吗应该还不错

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 16:00
主机 24 G 空间大小，做站应该还可以，不用折腾了

作者: 飞天金猪 时间: 2011-12-26 16:01
还有新加坡不丑

作者: 西崽猪猪 时间: 2011-12-26 16:06
坚决不要老鹰，谁用谁知道。。那个掉包率那个联通率。。。。各种坑爹

作者: 西崽猪猪 时间: 2011-12-26 16:07

飞天金猪发表于 2011-12-26 16:01
还有新加坡不丑

**新加坡is very slow

作者: 飞天金猪 时间: 2011-12-26 16:08

西崽猪猪发表于 2011-12-26 16:07
**新加坡is very slow

可以玩玩怎么绕圈圈

作者: blu 时间: 2011-12-26 16:09
是便宜

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 16:17
自己今天买的圣何塞：

Pinging 50.23.65.* with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=242ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 50.23.65.*:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 242ms, Maximum = 273ms, Average = 265ms
Control-C
^C

作者: zyzit 时间: 2011-12-26 16:17
可是我用来做什么呀？

作者: yu.gs尊 时间: 2011-12-26 16:27
艰辛啊

作者: nop 时间: 2011-12-26 16:28
无爱流量太小，安心做站的去吧

作者: nuet 时间: 2011-12-26 17:12
能放仿牌不！

作者: 西崽猪猪 时间: 2011-12-26 17:17

HelloStranger 发表于 2011-12-26 16:17
自己今天买的圣何塞：

Pinging 50.23.65.* with 32 bytes of data:

http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=50.23.102.93&c=&s=ping!

这是圣何塞，hawkhost线路不解释！，也不想解释

http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=174.36.161.149&c=&s=ping!
这也是老鹰的西雅图线路，我从来不解释。。

测试点就是一切

Packets lost 率你看看

作者: yu.gs尊 时间: 2011-12-26 17:32
今天买的圣何塞，晚些再补西雅图楼主批块地我去盖城堡去

作者: 随风舞 时间: 2011-12-26 17:33
这个果断没兴趣了....

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 17:40

西崽猪猪发表于 2011-12-26 17:17
http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=50.23.102.93&c=&s=ping!

这是圣何塞，hawkhost线路不解释！，也不 ...

这也太悲剧了，我的看起来怎么还算正常

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 17:41
Pinging 50.23.65.* with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=254ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=363ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=357ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=285ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=258ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=276ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=257ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=264ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=252ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=254ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.23.65.*: bytes=32 time=263ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 50.23.65.*:
Packets: Sent = 61, Received = 61, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 252ms, Maximum = 365ms, Average = 271ms
Control-C
^C

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-26 17:44
10    4 ms    5 ms    3 ms  219.158.21.237
11    6 ms    5 ms    5 ms  219.158.97.98
12    5 ms    5 ms    5 ms  219.158.97.110
13 241 ms 227 ms 218 ms  219.158.29.222
14 266 ms 266 ms 267 ms  sjp-brdr-04.inet.qwest.net [63.146.27.85]
15 259 ms 260 ms 262 ms  snj-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.34.50]
16 260 ms 261 ms 262 ms  ae11.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com [65.113.3
2.242]
17 268 ms 261 ms 250 ms  ae5.dar01.sr01.sjc01.networklayer.com [173.192.1
8.249]
18 259 ms 265 ms 270 ms  po1.fcr01.sr01.sjc01.networklayer.com [50.23.118
.131]
19 273 ms 265 ms 250 ms  sjc003.hawkhost.com [50.23.65.*]

作者: dotww 时间: 2011-12-26 17:58
楼主签名半天没打开.

作者: dotww 时间: 2011-12-26 18:00
http://www.whmcs.com/hawkhost/
不是自动授权的吗?

作者: 阳光淡蓝 时间: 2011-12-26 18:00
不知道老鹰主机怎么样。。

作者: farmer 时间: 2011-12-26 18:03
便宜啊
速度怎么样？

作者: esited_小江 时间: 2011-12-26 18:08
没有想法··

作者: hklop 时间: 2011-12-26 18:15
国人太多，没独立IP容易被墙。

作者: Comcast 时间: 2011-12-26 23:02
碉堡太厉害了，飘过啊

作者: atrong 时间: 2011-12-26 23:26
虚机

作者: HelloStranger 时间: 2011-12-27 13:48
那个西雅图的先让客服取消了，只留了个圣何塞

作者: 真内存 时间: 2011-12-27 13:49

作者: prometheus 时间: 2011-12-27 14:10
国人太多

作者: yu.gs尊 时间: 2011-12-27 14:10
啊哦，到期了

作者: lizh8791 时间: 2011-12-27 15:00
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://hostloc.gdisk.cf/)